Posts Tagged ‘continuous cruiser’
Saturday, February 19th, 2011
Yes, mention of Sally Ash and the 1995 Act on the same piece of paper. We hear Ms Eichmann is currently undergoing flailing to ensure her place in the bunker after all the lies she has told.
BRITISH WATERWAYS ANNOUNCE RIVER LEE NAVIGATION MOORINGS MANAGEMENT PLAN
British Waterways is today (18 February 2011) calling upon local authorities, residents, boaters and all who use the River Lee and River Stort Navigations and the Hertford Union Canal to comment on its proposals to introduce a new moorings management plan for the area.
Read more…
Tags: continuous cruiser, Damian Kemp, Lee Navigation, liveaboards, mooring policy, Moorings Consultation, Sally Ash
Posted in Moorings Consultation | 1 Comment »
Tuesday, September 28th, 2010
A recent survey shows that 100% of eighteen-year-olds living on boats in the Bradford on Avon area have gained places at Oxford University, proving that as a group we have more brain power than BW. Well, OK, that’s actually only one person! Congratulations to the student in question and best of luck with your studies!
Tags: Bradford-on-Avon, continuous cruiser, liveaboards
Posted in News, Stories | 2 Comments »
Tuesday, August 17th, 2010
A boater has been asked to represent unaffiliated boaters (ie those not represented by NABO or RBOA) on the Local Mooring Strategy Inquiry Panel. In February BW agreed to include them on the panel, then later went back on its commitment, but following pressure from NABO and RBOA as well as from other boaters, BW has now included one unaffiliated boater. The first meeting is on 26 August at County Hall, Trowbridge, at 10am.
Read more…
Tags: continuous cruiser, Damian Kemp, Local Mooring Strategy, Moorings Consultation, NABO, Wiltshire County Council
Posted in BW Policy News and FOI Act Requests, Continuous Cruisers, Moorings Consultation, News | No Comments »
Tuesday, August 17th, 2010
From correspondence below, obtained via Freedom of Information from Bath and NE Somerset Council, it looks like BW and BANES are paying jointly for an extra boat checker. This appears to be instigated partly by Councillor Ian Dewey of Bathampton, who has been a key mover in efforts to move liveaboard boaters off the canal.
The “concerns” expressed take no account of the fact that the Mooring Guidance for Continuous Cruisers is not a legal requirement and clearly states that it does not have the force of law. Unlike the 14-day rule in Section 17 of the British Waterways Act, BW does not have the legal power to enforce it. In one of the emails, David Lawrence, BANES Deputy Director for Heritage Services, says he does not think there is a problem. It is not clear whether this extra staff appointment is going ahead permanently, as the original contract seems to have been for this summer. However, we do wonder whether this is a good use of a cash-strapped Local Authority’s money, as responsibility for enforcement on the canal lies with BW.
The information in these emails seems to imply that BW is bypassing whatever the local mooring strategy would decide – this has gone ahead before the local mooring strategy inquiry panel has even started meeting.
The emails are here. Banes enforcement 1 Banes enforcement 2 Banes enforcement 3 Banes enforcement 4 Banes enforcement 5 Banes enforcement 6 Banes enforcement 7 Banes enforcement 8
Tags: BANES Council, continuous cruiser, Damian Kemp, enforcement team, FOI request, Section 17, Waterways Act 1995
Posted in BW Policy News and FOI Act Requests, Continuous Cruisers, News | No Comments »
Sunday, June 6th, 2010
Two years ago, BW proposed in a previous consultation to increase the licence fee for boats without a home mooring by £150. This plan provoked enormous opposition from boaters. One of the responses to that 2008 consultation summed up how many of us feel. We decided it was time to share this inspiring and angry letter with other boaters. Here is an edited version.
18/10/2008
Dear Mr Salem
I have read British Waterways’ response to the BWAF report on boat licence fees and this is my response to that. I live on a boat and have done so for 18 years, I am an individual and speak for myself and do not subvert that right to user groups, whoever they might be.
The points I take exception to, which I believe are the main purpose of the exercise, are those relating to the so-called ‘continuous cruiser’ which is the absurd name and concept applied to people who live on boats who neither need nor want a permanent mooring.
Read more…
Tags: 14 day rule, British Waterways, continuous cruiser, Letters to BW and others, Moorings Consultation, Robin Evans, Sally Ash, Waterways Act 1995
Posted in Continuous Cruisers, Letters to BW and others, Moorings Consultation, Opinion | No Comments »
Friday, January 29th, 2010
One person’s resistance to British Waterway’s campaign against boaters on the Kennet and Avon
These letters tell the story of one boater’s resistance to BW’s unlawful attempt to enforce the Mooring Guidance for Continuous Cruisers as if it is the law.
Read more…
Tags: CC1, CC2, CC2A, complaints, continuous cruiser, continuous cruising, Section, Waterways Act 1995
Posted in Continuous Cruisers, Letters to BW and others | No Comments »
Tuesday, December 1st, 2009
This is one of the questions that didn’t get answered at the meeting. An example of how casually BW treat serious and well presented concerns. We present this question in full, as Mr Kemp is known to keep half a fearful eye on our doings, maybe he can give it the attention it deserves.
Read more…
Tags: CC1, CC2, complaints, continuous cruiser, continuous cruising, Letters to BW and others, mooring policy, Moorings Consultation
Posted in Letters to BW and others, Moorings Consultation | 1 Comment »
Saturday, October 31st, 2009
OK, y’all listen up.
At 6.00 on Friday 30th October, Sally Ash released details of the much changed moorings consultation. You have until 31 January 2010 to reply.
Read more…
Tags: 14 day rule, British Waterways, continuous cruiser, continuous cruising, mooring, mooring policy, moorings, residential mooring
Posted in BW Policy News and FOI Act Requests, Moorings Consultation | No Comments »